Unsafe Harbor
America is turning away refugees — and falling short on its international commitments.
The United States hasn’t overhauled immigration policy since the 1990s, even though most Americans agree the system is failing. And for thousands fleeing violence in Latin America, the consequences of inaction in Washington are treacherous. Will and our colleague Debbie Kang speak this time with a scholar fighting for asylum cases to get a fair shake, especially for women and LGBTQ applicants facing gender violence. With a backlog of nearly 2 million petitions, it’s a mammoth task.
Historian Kimberly Gauderman says applicants from Mexico, Central America and South America are are three times as likely to lose their asylum cases as petitioners from other parts of the world. With refugee policies that are stuck in a Cold War framework, she insists, the United States is violating international treaties and putting vulnerable people in harm’s way.
Twelve years ago, Gauderman got an unexpected email — one that she almost ignored, thinking it was sent in error. The writer was an attorney seeking help on an immigration case for a client from Ecuador. Could Gauderman provide expertise to support the case?
Absolutely, a colleague assured her. With that, Gauderman’s pro-bono work in the complex world of asylum law began. Now, her forthcoming volume offers advice from academics, advocates and lawyers, ranging from checklists and phone numbers to the history and social context of gender-based violence in Latin America.
The guide is both hopeful and practical. Gauderman says scholars from a range of humanities and social science disciplines have the just kind of deep knowledge, about the people and countries they study, to support asylum applications. She is committed to pushing the needle on an issue that American political leaders have left for immigration judges to sort out, often with life-and-death consequences.